Tribal Populations and Politics
Cultures and Killing
The politics in comparison to cultures whether they be from the West, East or so on each has their own subset of rules. However, all these cultures have similar ways in which they deal with death and murder. Each culture has a way in which the consequences of their actions, in this case murder, is dealt with differently by the Yanomamö clan than by the West. Western cultures handle murder by investigating, prosecuting potential suspects, and either lock them up or sentence them to the "death penalty". In the terms of the Yanomamö, they handle "killings" depending on the situation. When handling conflicts between villages they enter "fights" with no intent of any mortalities, however, these fights usually always end in death anyways. In the result of these deaths, as revenge or as a "consequence" each village will raid one another in order to in act their revenge. For every killing that happens, the Yanomamö will raid the one who had committed the heinous act. The points of these raids isn't not only to act in revenge for a lost kin, but the increased revenge raids they act upon will increase their status and marital power/rates. In comparison to Western cultures, the west gives the murderer at a chance for reconciliation, while the Yanomamö will dive into the opportunity to act upon their revenge.
Unokais
Upon killing someone, the man who had killed must perform a ritual known as unokaimou. Those who perform this ritual are thusly known as the unokai. The importance of this ritual and becoming an unokai is in order to protect the individual from being haunted by his victims' souls. Not everyone has to perform the unokaimou, so men may avoid doing as such. Though it is quite beneficial to be considered unokai, as young unokai are encouraged for their violent tendencies even as far as gaining attention and marital status through being an unokai, it also puts a target on their back. So, being a non-unokai leaves them free from most harm, as they're seen as undesirable and thusly not a threat to other tribes who may want to kill unokai out of sexual jealousy.
Yanomamö and Revenge Killings
The structure of their politics seems to revolve around the idea of revenge killings, and so the more killings one may have the more powerful they are. However, each ground has their own reserved leaders known as "patas" that lead their groups and essentially the "headman" of their familial structure as well. This is due to their patrilineal descent in their kinship. The largest kin group follows their patrilineal ancestors as the main "leader". However, depending on the size, it may result in multiple leaders if the kinship groups are of similar sizes. The headmen of their groups are much more successful and this may be seen through their polygynous marriages and how many wives they retain. Though it isn't strict, these marriages tend to usually only be between cross cousins, the opposite sex aunt or uncle of your father or mother.
Murder and Laws
Even though murder and other acts of violence are usually something people should not want to do. There are individuals who cannot control their urges or those who have a lack of self control of their emotions and commit crimes of passion. The reasoning for these laws is in order to subdue those who will commit violent and murderous acts, as Napoleon A. Chagnon explains that anthropologists struggle to figure out why humans are so enticed to cause violence, as the "phenomenon that occurs independently of other forms of violence," usually in the same group will choose to act on their violent urges independently of each other. With the lack of reasoning and explanation for these things, the one way to lower the chances of this happening is in order to make the consequences out weigh the "pros" of murder and violent crimes.
1. "In comparison to Western cultures, the west gives the murderer at a chance for reconciliation, while the Yanomamö will dive into the opportunity to act upon their revenge. "
ReplyDeleteThat's an interesting take on this. The "eye for an eye" mentality.
But consider this difference as well. Western societies have removed the "revenge" factor from it's system of justice. Both cultures use these systems to punish murder. But where as the punishment is delivered by kin of the dead in the Yanomamo, the punishment is delivered by the state system in Western societies.
As you note, even Western societies use killing (death penalty) as a punishment for murder. That isn't different.
2. You have kind of lumped the first two prompts together. Keep them separate to help me parse out your responses. Good description in general.
3. Good comparison here.
4. There are four sections here: Political, social, kinship and marriage & reproduction. For each, you are asked to explain the impact the revenge killings have on these factors.
You do draw direct connections between revenge killings and both their political (leadership) system and kinship. I don't see a similar connection between how their social system is shaped. For example, is their social system stratified as a result of the two statuses, unokais and non-unokais? Does this impact the social status of both men and women?
Missing also the impact of revenge killings on the ability to marry and reproduce. Who in the society is more likely to marry (and marry polygynously) and have more children? Unokais or non-unokais?
5. "There are individuals who cannot control their urges or those who have a lack of self control of their emotions and commit crimes of passion."
So they kill only because of emotion? Or is there something more to this?
Both Western cultures and the Yanomamo have laws against these behaviors, not because they are bad but because people may gain some benefit from engaging in those laws to the detriment of those around them.
We are creatures of biology, regardless of how "civilized" we might want to think we are. Killing can benefit an organism if they gain resources or a mate or defend their offspring in the process, correct? So that benefit is still there in humans, whether we like it or not. Killing is an instinctive, biological reaction to a threat of some sort, to our lives, to our family (genes) or to our resources, but it can also be a strategy to advance your survival, such as (for example) killing off a rival. Understand that this isn't excusing the behavior. It just explains it. But we need laws against this behavior, not because no one wants to do it but because sometimes people can benefit from this behavior... i.e., they DO want to kill because it benefits them. Laws protect us from selfish actions of others, acting to their own benefit and the harm of others.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHello, my name is Brijanai Larios,
I love the detail you have about the topic. For one it is very interesting to know how western civilization is completely different from those cultures that have adapted to a more non-controlled environment, they have built their own civilization and culture. When it comes to the Yanomamo, I was honestly shocked that they have a way of life where killing/revenge is looked upon as a successful lifestyle, and that determines your martial/advancement in reproduction. It intrigues me because biologically, we are animals and do have such instincts, yet we are the most intelligent species. This makes me wonder if we were born into a more uncontrolled environment, does being more savage come naturally? It really opens a huge load of questions for me. I love the detail you added and I agree with there being laws to prevent acts of violence. This does outweigh the “pros” of violent crimes.